為什麼希特勒也能上天堂？在第一本與神對話上市之前，似乎從未聽過這說法。讀過與神對話書籍的人，似乎也很少有人公開檢驗和探討這問題。
現在就讓我們來正視和搞懂這問題。從此篇開始我們將連續分享共10篇的【完整了解「希特勒為何上天堂？」系列摘文】，歡迎您一起來了解和檢驗這些「違背目前思想體系視為真理」的觀念——人類演化必然趨向的「新觀念」：
了解一些【違背「目前思想體系視為真理」的東西】 
【完整了解「希特勒為何上天堂？」系列摘文】-1/10
現在，我在下面的幾段話要告訴你們的，可能對某些人是非常難了解和接受的。它會違背許多你們目前的思想體系中視為真理的東西。然而，如果要讓這對話(與神對話信息)對你們有益(serve you)，我就不能讓你們還是以這些(陳舊的)思維結構繼續下去。
我要告訴你們的是：
沒有「爛人」這回事。只有那些「對事情的看法與你不同」的人，那些「對外在世界的想法模式與你不同」的人。我要告訴你的是：就每個人所處的世界模式而言，沒有人在做任何不得當的事。
「對」與「錯」的觀念一直都在改變：從這個文化到那個文化，從這個時代到那個時代，從這個宗教到那個宗教，從這個地方到那個地方……甚至從家庭之間到人與人之間。你可以向他們指出，某一時代許多人認為「對」的事——例如把被認為行巫術的人綁在火刑柱子上燒死——在今日被認為是「錯」的。
「對」與「錯」的定義，是一個不僅建立在「因時代不同而不同」，也建立在「因地區不同而不同」。你可以讓他們注意到，你們星球上的某些行為（例如娼妓），在某一地方是不合法的，卻在幾公里之外的另一地方是合法的。所以說，一個人是否被人判定為做「錯」，不是依據那個人實際已做的，而是他在哪裡做。
現在我要重複一件我在第一部(《與神對話 I》第2章)中說過的，而我知道對某些人來說，這是非常非常難以了解和領會的：「希特勒也上了天堂」。(Hitler went to heaven.)
尼爾：我不確定人們是否準備好聽這一點。
這本書的目的，以及我們所創造的這三部曲的每一部的目的，都是為了做好準備——為創造新的範型，新的領會做好準備；為開創更廣闊的視野、更恢宏的觀念做好準備。 (The purpose of this book, and of all the books in the trilogy we are creating, is to create readiness---readiness for a new paradigm, a new understanding; a larger view, a grander idea.)
尼爾：好吧。我現在要問的問題是，我知道有許多人都在想、都要問的問題：像希特勒這樣的人，怎麼可能已經到天堂了呢？世界上所有的宗教……我認為每一個宗教，都宣稱他已被咒詛，並直下地獄了。
首先要說的是，他不可能下地獄，因為地獄根本不存在。因此，他唯一能去的只有一個地方。但這不是重點。真正的重點是希特勒的行為是否為「錯」的。然而我已一再地說明，在宇宙中，並沒有「錯」或「錯」這回事。一件事情本質上並沒有對或錯。它只是「一件事情」。 (there is no “ right ” or “ wrong” in the universe. A thing is not intrinsically right or wrong. A thing simply is. 只是「如是」 )
你們認為希特勒是個惡魔的見解，是基於他下令屠殺了數百萬人，對嗎？
尼爾：這很明顯，當然是。
但如果我告訴你，你們所謂的「死亡」，實際上是可發生在任何人身上最棒的事情(the greatest thing that could happen to anyone)——那又怎麼樣呢？
尼爾：我認為這很難接受。
摘自《與神對話 II》第3章
What I'm going to tell you now, and in the passages which follow, may be very difficult for some people to understand and accept. It is going to violate much of what is held as truth in your present thought system. Yet I cannot let you go on living with these constructions if this dialogue is to serve you. So we must, now, in this second book, meet some of these concepts head on. But it's going to be bumpy going here for a while. Are you ready?
I am going to tell you this: there are no "rotten apples." There are only people who disagree with your point of view on things, people who construct a different model of the world. I am going to tell you this: No persons do anything inappropriate, given their model of the world.
You could tell them that people's ideas of "right" and "wrong" change—and have changed—over and over again from culture to culture, time period to time period, religion to religion, place to place… even from family to family and person to person. You could point out to them that what many people considered "right" at one time—burning people at the stake for what was considered witchcraft, as an example—is considered "wrong" today.
You could tell them that a definition of "right" and "wrong" is a definition established not only by time, but also by simple geography. You could allow them to notice that some activities on your planet (prostitution, for instance) are illegal in one place, and, just a few miles down the road, legal in another. And so, whether a person is judged as having done something "wrong" is not a matter of what that person has actually done, but of where he has done it.
Now I am going to repeat something I said in Book 1, and I know that it was very, very difficult for some to grasp, to understand. Hitler went to heaven.
Neale: I'm not sure people are ready for this.
The purpose of this book, and of all the books in the trilogy we are creating, is to create readiness—readiness for a new paradigm, a new understanding; a larger view, a grander idea.
Neale: Well, I’m going to have to ask the questions here that I know so many people are thinking and wanting to ask. How could a man like Hitler have gone to heaven? Every religion in the world… I would think every one, has declared him condemned and sent straight to hell.
First, he could not have gone to hell because hell does not exist. Therefore, there is only one place left to which he could have gone. But that begs the question. The real issue is whether Hitler's actions where "wrong." Yet I have said over and over again that there is no "right" or "wrong" in the universe. A thing is not intrinsically right or wrong. A thing simply is.
Now your thought that Hitler was a monster is based on the fact that he ordered the killing of millions of people, correct?
Neale: Obviously, yes.
Yet what if I told you that what you call "death" is the greatest thing that could happen to anyone—what then?
Neale: I'd find that hard to accept.
